RE: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification

["Mary McRae" <marypmcrae@gmail.com>]

Hi Michael,

  Probably using v1.0ed2 would be less confusing as a file name, but I don't see
any reason for having to recreate and reupload.

m   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 10:24 AM
> To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: 'James Bryce Clark'; Mary McRae
> Subject: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification
> 
> All,
> 
> the committee specification ballot for OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd 
> edition) is closed now, and it is my understanding that 
> OpenDocument v1.0 (end edition) has been approved as a 
> committee specification.
> 
> I therefore have made the adaptions to the specification 
> title pages and document identifiers. The OpenDocument v1.0 
> (2nd edition) Committee Specification is now available in 
> ODT, tagged PDF and HTML format at:
> 
> ODT:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19271/OpenDo
> cument-v1.0-cs2.odt
> 
> tagged PDF:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19270/OpenDo
> cument-v1.0-cs2.pdf
> 
> HTML (zipped):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19269/OpenDo
> cument-v1.0-cs2.zip
> 
> I have chosen "cs2" within the identifier to reflect that 
> this is the 2nd edition of OpenDocument v1.0. Mary, please 
> let me know if you think another identifier would be more apropriate.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Michael