[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: my comments on the numbering spec proposal discussed by David F. andFlorian R.
On Monday 11 December 2006 18:10, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:04 PM, David Faure wrote: > > > However the notion of a list-id for a bit more structure sounds > > nice, and from what I recall, > > MSWord lists also have the equivalent of a list-id, this is where > > this idea mostly comes from. > > My question about the generic identity issue goes back to the xml:id > discussion. Do we want to converge the myriad of different equivalent > attributes (but which XML tools of course do not understand as such) > towards xml:id? If yes, should we be introducing still new id > attributes? Well that's very different ;) xml-id is supposed to be unique, right? list-id, on the other hand, is about referring to a list from multiple numbered paragraphs, so it's definitely NOT unique (the same value would be found multiple times in a given xml document). -- David Faure, email@example.com, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).