[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: mycomments on the numbering spec proposal discussed by David F.andFlorian R.
Wow --- thats interresting. Let's assume the lists will restart, then I would expect: 1. 1.A. A.i. i.a. since: LS1=< {"1"/1}, {"1"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > LS2=< {"1"/1}, {"A"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > LS3=< {"A"/1}, {"i"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > LS4=< {"i"/1}, {"a"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > However I woudn't expect the lists to restart --- can you point me to the relevant ODF1.1 spec line? I would expect: 1. 2.A. C.ii. iv.c. --or-- 1. 2.A. 3.ii. 4.c. However I would ~never~ expect: 1. 1.1. A.A. i.i. /me is quite confused. ~Florian >>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 01/22/07 3:12 PM >>> Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > thanks for your resonse. We still need to get confirmation from David whether he agrees or not. > > Let me ask you a different question. What will be the outcome of the following list? > > <list style-name="LS1"> > <list-item> > <p>..<p> > <list style-name="LS2"> > <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item> > </list> > <list style-name="LS3"> > <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item> > </list> > <list style-name="LS4"> > <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item> > </list> > </list-item> > </list> > > with the list styles as given below. > > Thanks very much helping me to understand the problem. > > ~Florian > Hi, In my interpretation of the ODF specification 1.1 the above given list using the list definition given below will result in: 1. 1.1. A.A. i.i. Each <text:list> block restarts the numbering for the corresponding list level. Regards, Oliver. > > >>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 01/22/07 2:19 PM >>> > Florian Reuter wrote: >> Hi Oliver, >> Hi David, >> >> A question for a better understanding: >> >> So lets suppose we have the following list style definitions {style:num-format, text:display-levels}: >> LS1=< {"1"/1}, {"1"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > >> LS2=< {"1"/1}, {"A"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > >> LS3=< {"A"/1}, {"i"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > >> LS4=< {"i"/1}, {"a"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > >> >> and we have the following numbered paragraphs: >> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS1" level="1">..</..> >> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS2" level="2">..</..> >> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS3" level="2">..</..> >> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS4" level="2">..</..> >> >> my understanding of the list-id proposal is that this results in the following numbers: >> 1. >> 2.A. >> C.ii. >> iv.c. >> >> or will it be? (Which I would like more): >> 1. >> 2.A. >> 3.ii. >> 4.c. >> >> ~Florian >> >> P.S. Still trying to get it :-) >> >> > Hi, > > when I understand your list definitions correct, then you will get: > 1. > 1.A. > A.ii. > i.c. > > Note: There is only one paragraph on level 1 for this list, which is the > first paragraph one. The following paragraphs are all list items on > level 2 and are all sub-elements of the first one. > > In my interpretation of the list style, which is applied at a paragraph, > is used to build-up the numbering label. If the numbering label states, > that numbers of superior levels have to be included, these numbers > should be formatted in the number format given at this list style for > the corresponding level. > > The same holds for the same list converted to <text:list> using > attribute text:style-override. > > Regards, Oliver. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]