Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: mycomments on the numbering spec proposal discussed by David F.andFlorian R.

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Wow --- thats interresting.

Let's assume the lists will restart, then I would expect:
1.
1.A.
A.i.
i.a.

since:
LS1=< {"1"/1}, {"1"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
LS2=< {"1"/1}, {"A"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
LS3=< {"A"/1}, {"i"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
LS4=< {"i"/1}, {"a"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >

However I woudn't expect the lists to restart --- can you point me to the relevant ODF1.1 spec line? I would expect:
1. 
2.A.
C.ii.
iv.c.

--or--

1.
2.A.
3.ii.
4.c.

However I would  ~never~ expect:
1.
1.1.
A.A.
i.i.

/me is quite confused. 

~Florian

>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 01/22/07 3:12 PM >>>
Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> thanks for your resonse. We still need to get confirmation from David whether he agrees or not.
> 
> Let me ask you a different question. What will be the outcome of the following list?
> 
> <list style-name="LS1">
> <list-item>
>  <p>..<p>
>  <list style-name="LS2">
>   <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item>
>  </list>
>  <list style-name="LS3">
>    <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item>
>  </list>
>  <list style-name="LS4">
>    <list-item>  <p>..<p> </list-item>
>   </list>
> </list-item>
> </list>
> 
> with the list styles as given below.
> 
> Thanks very much helping me to understand the problem.
> 
> ~Florian
> 
Hi,

In my interpretation of the ODF specification 1.1 the above given list 
using the list definition given below will result in:
1.
1.1.
A.A.
i.i.

Each <text:list> block restarts the numbering for the corresponding list 
level.

Regards, Oliver.
> 
> 
>>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 01/22/07 2:19 PM >>>
> Florian Reuter wrote:
>> Hi Oliver,
>> Hi David,
>>
>> A question for a better understanding:
>>
>> So lets suppose we have the following list style definitions {style:num-format, text:display-levels}:
>> LS1=< {"1"/1}, {"1"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
>> LS2=< {"1"/1}, {"A"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
>> LS3=< {"A"/1}, {"i"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
>> LS4=< {"i"/1}, {"a"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
>>
>> and we have the following numbered paragraphs:
>> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS1" level="1">..</..>
>> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS2" level="2">..</..>
>> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS3" level="2">..</..>
>> <numbered-paragraph list-id="1" style-name="LS4" level="2">..</..>
>>
>> my understanding of the list-id proposal is that this results in the following numbers:
>> 1. 
>> 2.A.
>> C.ii.
>> iv.c.
>>
>> or will it be? (Which I would like more):
>> 1.
>> 2.A.
>> 3.ii.
>> 4.c.
>>
>> ~Florian
>>
>> P.S. Still trying to get it :-)
>>
>>
> Hi,
> 
> when I understand your list definitions correct, then you will get:
> 1.
> 1.A.
> A.ii.
> i.c.
> 
> Note: There is only one paragraph on level 1 for this list, which is the 
> first paragraph one. The following paragraphs are all list items on 
> level 2 and are all sub-elements of the first one.
> 
> In my interpretation of the list style, which is applied at a paragraph, 
> is used to build-up the numbering label. If the numbering label states, 
> that numbers of superior levels have to be included, these numbers 
> should be formatted in the number format given at this list style for 
> the corresponding level.
> 
> The same holds for the same list converted to <text:list> using 
> attribute text:style-override.
> 
> Regards, Oliver.
> 
>