[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: my comments on the numberingspec proposal discussed by David F. andFlorian R.
Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi, > > just wanted to get the list understanding phase restarted. > > Is there a common sense what the following list definition will lead to? > > LS1=< {"1"/1}, {"1"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > > LS2=< {"1"/1}, {"A"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > > LS3=< {"A"/1}, {"i"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > > LS4=< {"i"/1}, {"a"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … > > > <list style-name="LS1"> > <list-item> > <p>..<p> > <list style-name="LS3"> > <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item> > <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item> > </list> > </list-item> > </list> > > Will it be > 1. > 1.i. > 1.ii. > > -- or -- > 1. > A.i. > A.ii. > > or something completely different? > Hi, For me it's: 1. A.i. A.ii. as David, Michael and I already answered at 2007-01-22. Regards, Oliver.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]