[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] list-override proposal
Hi Florian, Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > /me is also disappointed that I don't really understand your proposal. However /me has not yet given up ;-) > > Regarding the schema you proposed in the name of Thomas and David I have the following question: > > In order to be backward compatible with ODF1.0/1.1 the list-id would have to be optional I guess. Is this mandatory by accident or by intention? I really don't mind whether we say the list-id should be mandatory, or whether it should be optional. But we have made already the decison that ODF 1.0/ODF 1.1 instances are not valid ODF 1.2 instances by making the office:version attribute mandatory, so this is more a question of the style than of backward compatibility. Best regards Michael -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Marcel Schneider, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]