OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office] Normative examples for ODF1.1


Hi Oliver,

but when you define "text:continue-numbering" as beeing "false" then
<text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"><text:p>A</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"><text:p>B</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
will result in
1. A
1. B

right? Since this isn't right the only conclusion if that the default is "true".

---

> This sample isn't valid ODF 1.1, because style:list-style-name="" isn't 
> possible in ODF 1.1

Now I disagree :-) The ODF1.1. spec clearly states
<quote>
The style:list-style-name attribute's value can be empty. In this case, an association with
a list style that is inherited from a parent style will be removed.
</quote>

This means that style:list-style-name="" is possible.

---

Regarding the posting from Thomas (http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00063.html) I have a different
understanding. As said in my world "counters are directly linked to list definitions". So we have to select one or the
other interpretation.

---

Thanks so much for the input. Attached are the updated samples according to your concerns I agree on :-)

Btw. to we have a clear understanding of a "Default Style"?

~Florian



>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 03/12/07 3:11 PM >>>
Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I compiled a set of normative samples during the weekend.
> 
> I hope it reflects Thomas' and Oliver's view.
> 
> If so I would like to vote on them today.
> 
> Thomas, Oliver: Please pay attention to the sample 10.
> 
> ~Florian
> 

First, I disagree about the given clarifications:

- default value of text:continue-numbering has to be "false", when you 
interpret the first paragraph of ODF 1.1 specification, sub chapter 
"Continue Numbering" in chapter 4.3.1 List Block.

- the markup of a list, namely the list style, doesn't define the 
content structure, namely the list. See also posting 
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00063.html from 
Thomas Zander.

ad Sample 9:
It's wrong.
As stated in the ODF 1.1 specification a default list style is applied 
to the list items of the first <text:list>. Thus, it doesn't equals the 
second list using <text:list-header> and the normal paragraphs.

ad Sample 10:
It's wrong.
This sample isn't valid ODF 1.1, because style:list-style-name="" isn't 
possible in ODF 1.1

ad Sample 11:
It's wrong.
A list style, given at a paragraph style, isn't applied to a normal 
paragraph. See ODF 1.1 specification, sub chapter "List Style" in 
chapter "14.1 Style Element".


Regards, Oliver.

normativeodf11samples.odt



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]