[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] style:list-style-name and list-id
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 10:51, Florian Reuter wrote: > Does this help? Not really. You just posted more thought, not reactions. > > * Michael stated the intend of ODF1.0 was to indeed have list-domains be > > separate from markup as we follow known standards, not always blindly > > follow the things that (previous) office suites do. > <disagree> > Michael looking in his crystal ball what ODF1.0 mean doesn't help. > I disagree that Michael really said "...not always blindly follow the > things that (previous) office suites do". Since it is the charter of ODF to > listen very carefully what office suite do :-) Summarize: We agreed to > focus on 1.2. and not to try to find out what ODF1.0 does any longer. > </disagree> What if you don't follow a 'he-said' / 'she-said' kind of argument and actually stated what your thoughts are on the subject matter. Michael wrote it in an email: On Monday 12 March 2007 15:41, Michael Brauer wrote: > Being among those who wrote the original list definition: While office > application in fact may use the list-styles to set up counter domains, > it was our intention to abstract from that, and to use the list > structure as in HTML to set up counter domains instead. So if this > differs from the office application behavior, it does so by intention. Do you still disagree that he said that? As a response to your dismissing the stance of the TC on list-style vs. list. We agreed to look at 1.2 for numbered paragraphs; NOT for all things under the sun. > * ODF is used in places outside the office suite. In places like HTML, TeX > and other languages that aim to separate content from markup the concept of > lists being discoupled from the markup they use has been folllowed. > > <agreed> > ODF is used in places outside the office suite. > </agreed> > <disagree> > Brinding Latex into play doesn't help, since neither my nor your porposal > supports what Latex does. They have "counter variables". Not "counter > domains". > <disagree> > <comment> > Both our proposals can encode HTML lists. > </comment> > > * KWord has had the concept of list-domain being separate from style for a > long time. > * OpenOffice does the opposite to KWord in that respect. > <comment> > MS Word does this opposite to KWord too. > </comment> To these points I have the same objection; you are not replying to the content of the points. Now; I'd really like to hear your reactions to the points stated; not just arguing my view of the point. But really on the content of it. You are capable of arguing on technical merit, I presume :) -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]