Re: [office] Critical problem

[Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>]

On Tuesday 13 March 2007 12:49, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hey. This is really no trick question. I don't know the answer. I only know
> an answer according to my proposal.

In the context of <text:list>s, how is your proposal different from ours?

See this stuff I wrote a week ago, in a reply to you.
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:08, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > I still don't see why a list-override would not be sufficient for you?
>
> That's a misunderstanding; I have absolutely nothing against list-override.
> As long as its used in the proper context.
>
> Basis difference between numbered paragraphs and text:list hierarchies are
> context.
> 1) numbered-paragraph does NOT have a way to map it to the list it belongs
> to. Text-list does have that because it is nested. So just get the xml-node
> that's the parent and you have the list it belongs to.
> We talked before about using the list-style as a marker for which list it
> belongs to; please read the archives for mails on why that's a bad idea.
> (hint its about separation of content and markup)
>
> 2) text:list does NOT have a way to give each item (aka paragraph) a
> different style. Instead you give the style to the list.
>
> The proposal I made in December [1] was to make the two basic units for
> lists more common by adding a feature to each.
> 1) Add list-id to numbered paragraphs to make it more like text:list.
> 2) add text:style-override to text:list to make it more like the numbered
> paragraphs.

-- 
Thomas Zander

PGP signature