[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Differences between list proposals
On Monday 16 April 2007 09:44, Florian Reuter wrote: > Oliver is not very precise here. A better statement would be > <revised> > Thus, the same XML fragment will be interpreted differently in ODF 1.1 > and ODF 1.2 with Proposal Two when Olivers' understand of ODF1.1 lists > is used. </revised> > However exactly this case is not specified by ODF1.1. Its also worth > mentioning that Olivers' understanding of ODF1.1 lists contradicts e.g. > with OOo's understanding of ODF1.1 lists. For a fact I know that what your proposal states means the way that KOffice does lists is completely wrong. In other words; your proposal would make documents created in koffice fail to comply. And may I say that I if someone employed by Sun and working on lists states that the current way of using lists is X and you are stating that to not be true. Then without looking at the tiny details; I'm certainly inclined to believe the technician that works on the code. Anyway; I read the both proposals and the comparison; my comparison would be really really simple: Propsal by Florian changes behavior incompatible with existing behavior, proposal by me/Oliver writes down the existing behavior and expands on that. Is there anything more that is relevant? -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]