[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Proposal to enhance hyperlinks to support shapes
Hi Thomas, I didn't ;-). A shape can also contain a "draw-frame". So its a generalization which is completely backward compatible: <define name="shape"> <choice> <ref name="draw-rect"/> <ref name="draw-line"/> <ref name="draw-polyline"/> <ref name="draw-polygon"/> <ref name="draw-regular-polygon"/> <ref name="draw-path"/> <ref name="draw-circle"/> <ref name="draw-ellipse"/> <ref name="draw-g"/> <ref name="draw-page-thumbnail"/> <ref name="draw-frame"/> <ref name="draw-measure"/> <ref name="draw-caption"/> <ref name="draw-connector"/> <ref name="draw-control"/> <ref name="dr3d-scene"/> <ref name="draw-custom-shape"/> </choice> </define> ~Florian >>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 07/19/07 5:55 PM >>> On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:04:21 Florian Reuter wrote: > please find attached a proposal to enhance hyperlinks to support shapes > in general and not only frames. Why did you remove the option to link to frames in your proposal? I think its valuable to link to a frame, even while most frames hold some sort of shape. There can be offsets involved which make the effect really different. On top of that; removing the option to link to frames doesn't seem backwards compatible (old docs liking to frames would become invalid) -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]