OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office] Proposal to enhance hyperlinks to support shapes


Hi Thomas,

I didn't ;-).
A shape can also contain a "draw-frame". So its a generalization which is completely backward compatible:
<define name="shape">
	<choice>
		<ref name="draw-rect"/>
		<ref name="draw-line"/>
		<ref name="draw-polyline"/>
		<ref name="draw-polygon"/>
		<ref name="draw-regular-polygon"/>
		<ref name="draw-path"/>
		<ref name="draw-circle"/>
		<ref name="draw-ellipse"/>
		<ref name="draw-g"/>
		<ref name="draw-page-thumbnail"/>
		<ref name="draw-frame"/>
		<ref name="draw-measure"/>
		<ref name="draw-caption"/>
		<ref name="draw-connector"/>
		<ref name="draw-control"/>
		<ref name="dr3d-scene"/>
		<ref name="draw-custom-shape"/>
	</choice>
</define>

~Florian


>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 07/19/07 5:55 PM >>>
On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:04:21 Florian Reuter wrote:
> please find attached a proposal to enhance hyperlinks to support shapes
> in general and not only frames.

Why did you remove the option to link to frames in your proposal?

I think its valuable to link to a frame, even while most frames hold some 
sort of shape. There can be offsets involved which make the effect really 
different.

On top of that; removing the option to link to frames doesn't seem 
backwards compatible (old docs liking to frames would become invalid)
-- 
Thomas Zander



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]