Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compactsyntax

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Bruce,

Actually I asked Svante about this and he suggested:

Relax -> compact Relax, followed by:

compact Relax -> Relax^1, followed by:

diff on Relax and Relax^1.

I would add some spot checking on some of the more complex 
constructions, say about 5% of the total. Just as a sanity check.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Dave Pawson wrote:
>> On 15/08/07, robert_weir@us.ibm.com <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Question is do we beleive that the Trang conversion is perfect and 
>>> will not
>>> introduce any errors?
>> The author of Trang believes this is not true.
>
> An awkward sentence construction: what's the referent "this"?
>
> From the rest of your message, it sound like it is "that conversion is 
> not perfect" (e.g. a double-negative), which would mean we can be safe 
> assuming it is "perfect"?
>
> Bruce
>
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Acting Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, OpenDocument Format (OASIS, ISO/IEC 26300)