Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compact syntax

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

In any case we probably should be doing
a complete review of the schema for 1.2 anyways, regardless of notation,
comparing it to the text of standard.  If we do this agains the compact
syntax we can do this all in one pass.

-Rob
___________________________

Rob Weir
Software Architect
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Software Group

email: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
phone: 1-978-399-7122
blog: http://www.robweir.com/blog/

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>

08/15/2007 12:49 PM

To	"robert_weir@us.ibm.com" <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>
cc	"OASIS Office" <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compact syntax

On 15/08/07, robert_weir@us.ibm.com <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Question is do we beleive that the Trang conversion is perfect and
will not
> introduce any errors?
The author of Trang believes this is not true.
I've never heard him go beyond what he is capable of.


> I assume it is not perfect (what software is?) so we
> would probably need to carefully review the translation and verify
that no
> errors were introduced.

Please do. Waste your time perhaps?

I'm sure James is as good as his word.


regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk