Re: [office] form:readonly

["Warren Turkal" <turkal@google.com>]

I totally agree with this. I think that readonly should be read-only.

With regard to this issue, it might be useful to have transitional and
strict forms of compliance with each ODF revision. The strict versions
wouldn't have to support as much backward compatibility as the
transitional ones.

wt

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
>  Another violation of our naming policy, readonly rather than read-only.
>
>  Hope everyone is having a great week!
>
>  Patrick
>
>  --
>  Patrick Durusau
>  patrick@durusau.net
>  Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
>  Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
>  Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
>  Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
>
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>  generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
>  at:
>  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>