[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Rules for handling parsing errors (was: proposal for ODF 1.2: extension of verticalrelationvaluesfor certain anchor types)
On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Reuter wrote: > > Options: > > a) Treat it as if the attribute was not there > > b) Try to preserve the value > > c) Treat is as if the attribute was there but overwrite the invalid value with a "default" value I don't see the difference between a and c. In both cases the application will use whatever default value it normally uses for this attribute -- which is IMHO the only sensible thing to require from an implementation [more precisely not requiring anything when it comes to the topic of unhandled attribute values. if they're unhandled, then by definition we can't expect them to be handled ;)]. b) is a common utopia solution which never solved any problem nor can be implemented fully. -- David Faure, email@example.com, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).