[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Glossary for 1.2
Dave, Dave Pawson wrote: > Many terms are used in the 1.1 standard for which a meaning must be 'guessed'. > It would help implementers and other readers if meanings were explicit > and referenced on first use. > > Do you mean as in having a "definitions" section? That is permitted but not required by JTC 1. Personally I dislike such sections as it forces a repetition of information that is defined elsewhere. That is I agree that terms should be defined but those definitions should occur in context and not in a list divorced from that context. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick > Would you add such an item to the standard please. > > regards > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]