Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay

[Malte Timmermann <Malte.Timmermann@Sun.COM>]

I don't agree on "require user agents to limit this to no more than 3
times a second".

I must admit that I don't believe a higher frequency would make any
sense for anything, but People have different needs, and if someone for
what every reason needs a higher frequency, the application should be
allowed to support this.

It's something the author should avoid.

Malte.


Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote, On 18.07.08 01:46:
> That is fine. This will just mean we will require user agents and
> authors to limit this to no more than 3 times a second which may cause
> epileptic seizures. If we did not have adequate justification for having
> this level of granularity we could avoid imposing this other
> requirement. ok?
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
> Inactive hide details for "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>"Duane
> Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
> 
> 
>                         *"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>*
> 
>                         07/14/08 02:23 PM
> 
> 	
> 
> To
> 	
> Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> 
> cc
> 	
> <office@lists.oasis-open.org>, <office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Subject
> 	
> Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> Whether or not it is done 1000 times per second is not the issue. Giving
> developers and document writers the ability to control it via mlsecs
> would be nice to have for interactive documents.  Transitions of content
> to highlight or change things (think MS PPT) should probably use a
> consistent model across all odf content.  Make some sense?
> Aus mein Blackberry/from my Blackberry
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
> To: Duane Nickull
> Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org>;
> office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org
> <office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Mon Jul 14 11:32:05 2008
> Subject: Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay
> 
> Is milliseconds practical? Would a table really update every x
> milliseconds? I can't imagine network performance making this practical.
> 
> The problem area is >= 3 times per second. This will cause seizures. If
> the update rate were seconds this is not a problem.
> 
> If it were this fast I would do a two pronged approach:
> 
> 
> * Tell authors to not set this to more than 3 times per second.
> * I would require that office agents provide a UI feature that allows
> the user to limit the refresh rate.
> 
> 
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
> "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
> 
> 07/12/08 10:29 PM
> 
> 
> 
> To
> 
> Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> 
> cc
> 
> <office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> 
> Subject
> 
> Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay
> 
> 
> I would highly recommend miliseconds but provide best practives to
> introdue warnings when use would result in seni-optimal UE's.
> 
> Sound logical?
> 
> D
> Aus mein Blackberry/from my Blackberry
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
> To: office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Cc: office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org
> <office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Sat Jul 12 08:52:20 2008
> Subject: [office] Table Refresh Delay
> 
> Can someone from the TC please tell me the units for:
> <table:refresh-delay> ?
> 
> Is this in seconds? This is very important for accessibility as if it is
> less than a second then there is a potential to cause seizures.
> 
> Whatever the answer, would someone please update the specification to
> reflect the actual units?
> 
> Thank you,
> Rich
> 
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
> 
> 
>