Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Title: Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay

The main point is that implementors have control when implementing the specification vs. being constrained by the spec.  Let’s not put weightless restrictions into the specification.

Duane


On 18/07/08 10:35 AM, "Peter Korn" <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> In OpenOffice.org we have the ability to turn animation off.  I agree with Malte; we shouldn't prevent the expression of fast animation for those who want it, but we should enable users to not have it displayed to them.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter Korn
> Accessibility Architect,
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
> >  
> > 2008/7/18 Malte Timmermann <Malte.Timmermann@sun.com> <mailto:Malte.Timmermann@sun.com> :
> >   
> >  
> > >  
> > > I don't agree on "require user agents to limit this to no more than 3
> > > times a second".
> > >
> > > I must admit that I don't believe a higher frequency would make any
> > > sense for anything, but People have different needs, and if someone for
> > > what every reason needs a higher frequency, the application should be
> > > allowed to support this.
> > >     
> > >  
> >  
> >
> > Strongly disagree Malte.
> >
> > If there is a riks of causing an epeleptic fit, then I'd like
> > to see a 'shall' statement in the standard requiring
> > nothing more than 3 times per second.
> >
> > Peoples needs are my concern too.
> >
> > regards
> >
> >
> >
> >   

-- 
**********************************************************************
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.
Duane's World TV Show - http://www.duanesworldtv.org/
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
**********************************************************************