OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [office] regrets


from my point of view another shift of the vote on my proposal 
"extension of vertical relation values for certain anchor types" is not 
- For me it looks like that the amendments made by Florian does not 
touch my intrinsic feature proposal, but provide a useful clarification 
for the properties, which are touched by my proposal.
- We should demonstrate progress on finishing ODF 1.2. That we need at 
least 7 weeks to accept/reject such a small proposal does not 
demonstrate such progress.

I propose the following:
- The TC should vote on my proposal in the next call. If the vote result 
considering Florian's negative vote would change the from "approval" to 
"rejection", we should again shift the vote until Florian's concerns are 
- The TC should vote, if the TC want to consider Florian's proposal to 
add clarifications to the properties, which are touched my proposal. If 
the vote is positive, these clarification should be worked out by 
Florian. [Note: I personally support such clarifications and expect a 
positive vote on it. But I think further work is needed to finalize them.]
- Florian should try to reply to my questions/comments to his made 
amendments until the TC call on Monday. Then the TC can consider this 
reply during the TC call on Monday. I can imagine that Florian's reply 
would finalize the clarifications to the properties, which are touched 
by my proposal. In this case the TC can directly vote on these 
clarification to include them into ODF 1.2

Best regards, Oliver.

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
> ups --- mixed it up. I thought Rob was talkting about the vertl-rels...
> Rob/Oliver: Please kindly also defere the vote on the vert-rels until I had a chance to address the questions in the TC.
> Thanks,
> ~Florian
>>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 07/24/08 7:37 AM >>>
> Hi Florian,
> I am sorry, but I have no questions regarding your third proposal 
> "Grouping for Radio Elements".
> Regards, Oliver.
> Florian Reuter wrote:
>> Hi,
>> yep -- since Oliver had some questions that would make sense.
>> Thanks,
>> ~Florian
>>>>> <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> 07/23/08 5:20 PM >>>
>> So presumably we will defer the discussion of your third proposal, which 
>> we were not able to get to on the last call?
>> -Rob
>> "Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com> wrote on 07/23/2008 10:54:30 AM:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm traveling next Monday so I won't be able to attend the call.
>>> ~Florian

Sun Microsystems GmbH    Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Nagelsweg 55             Software Engineer - OpenOffice.org/StarOffice
20097 Hamburg
Germany                  Fax:   (+49 40) 23 646 550
http://www.sun.de        mailto:oliver-rainer.wittmann@sun.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft:
Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (od) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]