[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ODF 1.0 Approved Errata 01 -- Public review comments
The public review period of our ODF 1.0 Approved Errata 01 document concluded on Friday. We are required under OASIS TC Process 3.2 ( http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#publicReview) to take certain actions with regard to these comments: "The TC must acknowledge the receipt of each comment, track the comments received, and publish to its primary e-mail list the disposition of each comment at the end of the review period." I've gone through our public comment list and extracted the following comments which were submitted August 7th through August 22nd and which concerned the errata document. Dennis E. Hamilton: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00012.html Sheldon Britton: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00015.html Dave Pawson: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00017.html Murata Mokoto: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00027.html Murata Mokoto: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00052.html Dennis E. Hamilton: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00059.html Let's see if we can get through these comments on Monday. If we decide to change the approved errata draft, we can certainly do so, though it would require that we create and approve another draft and re-submit it for another day public review. So any change will essentially delay publication by a month. If we do not change the draft, we remain free to make additions or changes in 6 months, with an updated Approved Errata document. TC members should consider how they want to proceed: Option #1 - We acknowledge the public comments received, but decline to make any changes at this time. This provides something to JTC1/SC34 now, but will delay any other comment resolutions by 6 months. Option #2 -- We make changes suggested in the public comments, including expanding the scope to include the additional comments which Murata-san suggests are missing. This will require preparation of a new draft, approval by the TC, and a new 15 day public review period. So it will introduce an additional 1 month delay. Option #3 -- We make changes suggested in the public comments, but do not seek any further vote as Approved Errata. So we essentially leave this draft Approved Errata document open, and can continue to add items to it. We make our intent know to not issue it as Approved Errata until we've caught up with the existing public comments, in particular all those from Murata-san. Option #3 would get everything out faster if we could review and resolve all ODF 1.0 public comments in less than 6 months. If we believe it would take more than 6 months to catch up, then Option #1 would be better. Option #2 gives as a smaller delay (1 month) but potentially allows us to address a few more comments. -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]