[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: #6.8 - Errata Review
Dennis, Another question: Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: <snip> > ODF 1.0 IS 26300 > Section page line page line > > > <snip> > *9.5.3* *330* *27* *334* *29* [under "T" *** missed ***, same as B and V] > When you say "missed," do you mean not in the Japanese defect report? If so, why would it appear in this errata document? (Note I am not disagreeing an error exists, but asking about the scope of this particular errata document.) Hope you are having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]