RE: [office] preferred view mode upon opening document

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

We should probably track the conformance part of this as a new proposal.

We should also probably, perhaps with Patrick's assistance, see if there 
are multiple synonyms which mean the same thing, and which should be 
regularized.

I'm thinking implementation-defined, application-defined, vendor-defined, 
implementation specific, implementation dependent, etc.  I'm assuming 
these are not all subtly different in intent but represent the same thing.

-Rob

"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 10/30/2008 
10:36:07 PM:
> 
> I'm aligned with this too, along with Warren.
> 
> It might be useful have a registry of such implementation-defined 
attribute
> values so their specification can be widely known and possible addition 
to
> the standard considered in the way that happens more deliberately. 
> 
>  - Dennis 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00164.html
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 01:47
> To: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
> Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [office] preferred view mode upon opening document
> 
> This sounds good to me. I only would like to add that whenever an 
> implementor adds an implementation specific value and believes that 
> other implementations could make reasonable use of it, that I then would 

> strongly recommend to submit a proposal to the TC to standardize this 
value.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On 29.10.08 22:09, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00161.html
> 
> [ ... ]
>