RE: [office] Please read: Procedure proposal for ODF 1.2 proposals

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Here is my assignment of points for the ranking of ODF 1.2 proposals:

Dennis Hamilton
+5 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Document_Types


 - Dennis


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00094.html
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 05:17
To: Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
Cc: OpenDocument Mailing List
Subject: Re: [office] Please read: Procedure proposal for ODF 1.2 proposals

The list of proposals that have been requested for consideration for ODF 
1.2 is this:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00089.html

Michael

On 12/11/08 11:59 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00091.html
> Dear TC members,
> 
> the deadline for requesting proposals for consideration in ODF 1.2 has
> passed.
> 
> The consideration of 16 proposals has been requested. We have 6 TC
> members that requested the inclusion of at least one proposal, and the
> number of requests per TC members varies between 1 and 7.
> 
> The assumption for the schedule we agreed in the last TC call was that
> we have 5 requests, and we agreed to make a decision how to proceed in
> the next call if the number of requests is above 5. We got 16 requests.
> We therefore need to decide now how to proceed.
> 
> I have discussed the situation with Rob, and this what we would like to
> propose:
> 
> 1) All TC members with voting rights (a list is below) have 5 votes
> that they can cast on any set of proposals.  Voters can split their vote
> among 5 different proposals, put all their 5 votes on a single proposal,
> or divide them up in any way they choice, among the proposals listed.
> 
> 2) This votes are cast by sending the vote allocations to the mailing
> list before the TC meeting on Monday.
> 
> 3) The votes themselves are non-binding until the TC, in the meeting on
> Monday, the 15th of December, decides to give them a meaning.
[ ... ]