OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: ODF 1.2 Version Significance Proposal - Update #3


This is the third response to review of the Version Significance Proposal.  

Update #1 on the beginning of the proposed text is at <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200901/msg00076.html>.

Update #2 on when ODF 1.2 documents are also compatible with earlier specifications is at <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200901/msg00077.html>.

I will incorporate the restatements in the proposal at <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Version_Significance>.  I will produce a recap that combines all of these updates as the revised draft.  

TREATMENT OF ODF 1.2 DOCUMENTS BY EARLIER PROCESSORS

COMMENT:

> The treatment of such documents by processors designed to implement
> earlier versions of ODF is implementation-specific and is not subject
> to ODF 1.2 conformance requirements.

Actually, the treatment of such documents is subject to the ODF 1.0 and
1.1 specifications. Whether an ODF 1.2 application additionally supports
ODF 1.0 and/or 1.1 is implementation specific. It may, or it may not. It
is nothing where we should make any assumptions or statements in the ODF
1.2 specification

RESPONSE:

This statement was about treatment of documents identified as ODF 1.2 documents by processors designed in support of earlier versions of the specification.

However, I think the restatement in Update #2 avoids needing to say more and I deleted the fragment quoted above as part of making Update #2.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200901/msg00041.html
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 05:24
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: 'ODF TC List'; Rob Weir
Subject: Re: [office] ODF 1.2 Version Significance Proposal

Hi Dennis,

thank you very much for the proposal. Please find a couple of
comments/suggestions below:

On 05.01.09 01:24, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200901/msg00011.html
[ ... ]
> The treatment of such documents by processors designed to implement
> earlier versions of ODF is implementation-specific and is not subject
> to ODF 1.2 conformance requirements.

Actually, the treatment of such documents is subject to the ODF 1.0 and
1.1 specifications. Whether an ODF 1.2 application additionally supports
ODF 1.0 and/or 1.1 is implementation specific. It may, or it may not. It
is nothing where we should make any assumptions or statements in the ODF
1.2 specification

[ ... ]



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]