Re: [office] Conformance Definitions

[Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

2009/2/2 Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com>:
> Thanks for the info, Rob.  Yes, that does clear up why this is on the table.
>
> I still don't understand the intent of removing and/or deprecating support for foreign elements, however, which seems to be a direction that has only come up very recently.  There are a growing number of organizations building custom solutions around those sorts of extensibility mechanisms,

'extensibility mechanisms' which is exactly what they are. Extensions
to a 'standard'.
Less the extensions we could have interop. With them, you need a kludge
or a 'standard' way of treating them. Neither are in 1.1 or 1.2 (as yet)


regards







-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk