[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Part 2?
Greetings! Already proofing on part 1 and ran into an issue that may involve part 2. In the introduction (1.1 in the current draft) we say: > Part 2 defines a formula language for OpenDocument documents. > But that's not right is it? Shouldn't it read: "Part 2 defines *the* formula language for OpenDocument documents." And then later under conformance, we will need to account for allowable values for text:formula and table: formula being defined by Part 2. Yes? Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau firstname.lastname@example.org Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)