[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-comment] About this mailing list
Hi everyone, Just jumping in here for a public service announcement. The public comment facility (i.e. the office-comment email list) is the only allowed mechanism for feedback to the TC. This is not just during public reviews (at which point all comments must be logged and their resolution noted before progressing further), but any and all input to a TC from non-TC members. If anyone has any questions with regard to OASIS Policies, please feel free to contact me directly. Regards, Mary ___________________________________________________________ Mary P McRae Director, Technical Committee Administration OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org phone: 1.603.232.9090 > -----Original Message----- > From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:33 AM > To: office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [office-comment] About this mailing list > > marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote on 03/02/2009 08:17:48 AM: > > > > > Re: [office-comment] About this mailing list > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 > - > > Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@sun.com> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > we have seen a lot of discussions on this mailing list, that in > general is a > > > good thing. However, as Rob Weir pointed out already, the purpose > of > this > > > mailing, as defined by the OASIS Technical Committee Process[1], > is: > > > > > > "The purpose of the TC?s public comment facility is to receive > comments from > > > the public and is not for public discussion." > > > > That quotation is missing important following detail: > > > > "Comments from non-TC Members must be collected via the TC?s archived > > public comment facility; . The TC must acknowledge the receipt of > each > > comment, track the comments received, and publish to its primary > > e-mail list the disposition of each comment at the end of the review > > period." > > > > <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#publicReview>. > > > > If you read the context further, you'll see that this is only a > requirement for comments received during a public review draft, during > a > public review. > > But we also have a Call for Proposals running for ODF-Next at this time > as > well. So we welcome comments on ODF here. But comments on comments, > that > is something else entirely. That belongs on the discussion list. > > You can see how our work in tracking each legitimate public review > comment > is made more difficult if the signal/noise ratio on this list is low. > It > also frustrating for the person who joins the list to submit a comment, > stays on the list for a day or two for an acknowledgement, and then is > deluged with dozens of heated posts debating the nature of > interoperability. We need to respect the purpose of this list. > > -Rob > > > -- > This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the > OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC. > > In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and > to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required > before posting. > > Subscribe: office-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > Unsubscribe: office-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > List help: office-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org > List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/ > Feedback License: http://www.oasis- > open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > Committee: http://www.oasis- > open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]