[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Discussions, comments, TC members, SC34 and the public
Evidently there is still some confusion on this topic, so let me lay it out as I see it. Please let me know if there are any questions or concerns or disagreements regarding the following assertions. Once SC34 signs off of the maintenance procedures, I'd like us to adopt Standing Rules for the TC that formally codifies how we deal with comments. Obviously we need to comply with OASIS process, but we are able to define a specific TC workflow that fits within those requirements. -Rob 1) Any member of the public, including SC34 members, are free to submit comments to the office-comment list at any time. 2) Comments sent to the office-comment during public review periods will be acknowledged, recorded and disposed by the ODF TC, as required by OASIS TC Process 3.2. 3) Comments sent at any other time may be acknowledged, recorded and disposed by the ODF TC at our discretion. 4) SC34 as a committee may send formal comments, defect reports, etc. on ODF at any time. These will be sent via the SC34 Liaison to the TC (Patrick) who will post these to the ODF TC's document repository. Such communications will be processed by the ODF TC regardless of when they arrive, according to the maintenance agreement with SC34. 5) Comments by individual SC34 members, on drafts, TC process, etc., and sent to the office-comment list, are no different than public comments, and will be treated according to 1-3 above. 6) The discussion and resolution of comments is the responsibility of the ODF TC and such discussions will occur on the ODF TC's mailing list and in ODF TC meetings. Currently Rob owns the task of collecting comments and transcribing them to the Registry of Comments spreadsheet. 7) As we discuss comments in TC calls, we may delegate to a TC member further analysis of a comment, which may include communicating with the original comment submittor to clarify the comment. 8) Where an official response from the TC is required, such as during a public review period, or to an SC34 defect report, the decision will first be made by the TC in a meeting, the decision recorded in the minutes, and the results communicated by the Chairs or the SC34 Liaison to the office-comment list or SC34, respectively. 9) Other OASIS venues for public discussions on ODF include the forums on OpenDocument,xml.org and the opendocument-users mailing list. The public as well as ODF TC members may participate on these lists freely. 10) The TC may request the creation of additional mailing lists for other purposes. For example, we could ask for an opendocument-dev mailing list. 11) Note OASIS TC Process 2.8: "Comments to the TC made by Members of the TC must be made via the TC general email list, and comments made by non-TC members, including from the public, must be made via the TC?s comment facility. Comments shall not be accepted via any other means." So TC members should not be commenting, as individuals, on the office-comment list. 12) The proper place for TC members to discuss ODF is the TC's office list. Any member of the public is welcome to join the TC and receive the benefits of membership, including the ability to participate directly in such discussions. 13) TC members may be involved in various forms of external communications, via other mailing lists, blogs, contacts with the media, analysts, etc. The key thing there is to respect the OASIS Media Relations Policy: http://www.oasis-open.org/news/media_relations_policy.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]