[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Public Comments from N1078
I am not sure why the ones from N1078 are being passed over. They have not, to my knowledge been reviewed in one of these discussions. Also, my assigning of "Candidate for Errata" was very cursory and without discussion (and no consideration of the severity levels that were proposed since). Can we clarify what the assumption is about what is happening with the N1078 ones and who has the action for the next step? I think I may have it but I have not been taking it seriously enough. I will repent, but I want clarity first. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 05:20 To: OpenDocument Mailing List Subject: [office] Public Comments 214 to 256 Dear TC members, I had a closer look at the public comments from 214 to 256 (unless they came from N-1078) and have made some suggestions how to resolve them. [ ... ] 219: is from N1078 [ ... ] 222: is from N1078 [ ... ] 224-231: Are from N1078 [ ... ] 233-238: Are from N1078 [ ... ] 241-242: Are from N1078 [ ... ] 245-249: Are from N1078 [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]