[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: encryption
Hi Bob, On 08/31/09 16:45, Bob Jolliffe wrote: > In addition - I don't know the answer to this, but in the interest of > uniformity, is there also an IRI which can used to indicate blowfish? > Then we are clear the value of the attribute is an IRI. I don't think there is an IRI defined for blowfish, but it seems to be a good idea to define one. To provide backward compatibility we anyway would have to support the old non-IRI values, but we may deprecate them later if we define an IRI now. Thank you for your feedback. Michael > > 2009/8/31 Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com > <mailto:bobjolliffe@gmail.com>> > > what I was trying to say on the call is that we now have 3 options > for each algorithm, including a catchall "implementation defined" > IRI. I would prefer to see this last option allowed but not > recommended. > > Regards > Bob > > -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]