OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-1219) Public Comment: Re:[office-comment] ODF 1.2 References

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16181#action_16181 ] 

Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-1219:



The harder question is which ones are normative for ODF 1.2?

BTW, we need to add a normative reference for XHTML.  

Here is my take:

CSS2 - non-normative, cited at 15.9 <style:font-face> but there as a should/informative. 

DAISY - delete, does not appear elsewhere in ODF 1.2

DCMI - normative - Use this marker at 3.3.1? 

DOMEvents2 - See 18.432, "should use the event names described in [DOMEvents2]..." Normative?

GRDDL - normative? That is to say, is conformance required for conforming to ODF 1.2?

HTML4 - cited at 9.4.7 <draw:applet> for having the same semantics. At 13.4.3 Event Types - "In addition to the HTML event types, implementation event types may be specified." But that is just a text reference and not to this identifier. Are these the same events as 18.432 script:event-name? Or are there others? This needs some work to be a normative reference. 

ISO 15924 - I can't find a citation of this in the current text. 

ISO3166-1, -2, -3, Normative, conformance required, see 17.3.10 CountryCode

ISO639-1, -2, -3, Normative, conformance required, see 17.3.17 LanguageCode 

JDBC - we removed the <db:java-classpath> which cited this. Now remove JDBC?

MathML - cited at 1.3 (as namespace), Conforming OpenDocument Documents (valid with respect to MathML 2.0...), 13.5 <math:math> - Suggest Normative.

MIMETYPES - I don't know that a location is a normative reference. ??

ODF10 - Do we need/want a normative reference to ODF 1.0? Seems like it could be confusing unless we have a very good reason to cite another OpenDocument standard. Yes?

ODF11 - same reasoning - no objection to listing them but looking for a reason for them to be present

OLE - I am assuming non-normative. Yes?

OOo - I am assuming non-normative. Yes?

OWL - normative

PNG - normative

RDF-Concepts - non-normative

RDF-XML - normative

RDFa - normative

RFC2045 - not cited in text

RFC2046 - not cited in text

RFC2048 - not cited in text

RFC2616 - not cited in text

RFC3066 - not cited in text

RFC4288 - not cited in text

RFC4646 - cited in text, see style:rfc-language-tag for example.

RFC4855 - not cited in text

RNG - Do we need a reference?

SMIL20 - normative

SQL - See the discussion on this point. Is this the correct version, that is it states the 92 restriction?

SVG - Normative 

UAX9 - non-normative

UNICODE - Correct version? But normative.

UTR20 - non-normative?

XForms - normative

XLink - normative

xml-names - normative

XML1.0 - normative

xmlenc-core - I think we need to make this normative and cite it in the digital signature section.

xmlschema-2 - normative (for data types)

XSL - normative

XSLT - non-normative

Comments/suggestions on the normative/non-normative breakdown? 

> Public Comment: Re: [office-comment] ODF 1.2 References
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OFFICE-1219
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1219
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: External References
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> 
> Original date: 20 Feb 2009 03:45:51 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200902/msg00020.html

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]