[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] OpenDocument-v1.2-part3-draft12.odt
Speaking hypothetically, the combined ballot means that someone who thinks going to CD is fine but public review is premature has to be willing to end up with neither in that ballot round. Since we've not yet had a CD for Part 3, I think we should work the stages progressively, especially since public review puts some restrictions on our ability to modify the document short of deciding not to go to CS and going to another CD instead, putting us pretty much back at start. - Dennis PS: And the current draft seems to be attracting public comments as it is. -----Original Message----- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200910/msg00303.html Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 06:41 To: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [office] OpenDocument-v1.2-part3-draft12.odt +1 for conducting the ballot. Since approving a CD and sending it out to public review both require a Full Majority Vote, we should be able to do this in a single ballot. But we will need some additional language in the ballot question. I think we have the main question as: "Shall the OASIS ODF TC approve ODF 1.2, Part III, Draft 12 as a Committee Draft and to send that Committee Draft out for a 60-day Public Review?" [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]