[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] So what happens in a public review?
Hi Rob, I hope you would export into a spreadsheet and not plain text ;) Spreadsheets can be uploaded to Kavi and linked to in a mail message, or attached to the message itself. Mary Mary P McRae Director, Standards Development Technical Committee Administrator OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen phone: 1.603.232.9090 Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open. On Nov 16, 2009, at 8:07 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM wrote on 11/16/2009 03:47:13 AM: > > >> >> I suggest that we add a target "ODF 1.2 part 3 cd01" to JIRA and use >> that for all JIRA issues that refer to the part 3 that is in public >> review, regardless whether they have been submitted by a TC member or >> are copies of public comments. This may help us to find these issues, >> and in particular may help us to create report logs. >> > > A filter based on data range (13 November-12 January) AND component > (Packaging) would find these as well, even if we do not assign a new > version target. A find version target would work as well. I don't have a > strong preference on this, so long as we are consistent. > > As for exporting from JIRA, we have several options: > > A) Define a filter that encompasses all comments and link to that. For > example we do that with SC34 defect reports: > http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10012 > > However, I'm guessing that would not be considered sufficient for OASIS, > since it isn't a fixed report, since JIRA resolutions can be changed or > reversed. > > B) Export from JIRA, using one of the supported export options. For > example, "Full Content" appears to be in a format which might be good: > > http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-fullcontent/10012/SearchRequest-10012.html?tempMax=1000 > > However, I'm not sure how well it will survive via cut & paste into plain > text in mail readers. Here is sample so we can see what it would look > like: > > > > > [OFFICE-436] Public Comment: "this section" in 15.28.4??? [N0942#93] > Created: 05/May/09 Updated: 09/Jun/09 > Status: > New > Project: > OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Component/s: > None > Affects Version/s: > ODF 1.0 (second edition) > Fix Version/s: > ODF 1.0 Errata 01 > > > Type: > Bug > Priority: > Trivial > Reporter: > Robert Weir > Assignee: > Unassigned > Resolution: > Unresolved > > > > > > Description > > > Copied from office-comment list > > Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> > > Original date: 28 Apr 2007 17:10:43 -0000 > Original URL: > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200704/msg00011.html > > > > > > [OFFICE-437] Public Comment: "the object once-concurrently." in 15.27 > [N0942#94] Created: 05/May/09 Updated: 09/Jun/09 > Status: > New > Project: > OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Component/s: > None > Affects Version/s: > ODF 1.0 (second edition) > Fix Version/s: > ODF 1.0 Errata 01 > > > Type: > Bug > Priority: > Trivial > Reporter: > Robert Weir > Assignee: > Unassigned > Resolution: > Unresolved > > > > > > Description > > > Copied from office-comment list > > Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> > > Original date: 28 Apr 2007 17:11:05 -0000 > Original URL: > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200704/msg00012.html > > > > > C) We could do an XML export and then XSLT it into a suitable output > format. The export format is RSS 0.92. > > > However we do this, we'll need to have a more discipline in how we encode > items in JIRA. In particular, I think we should always put something in > the "Resolution" field when disposing an issue. Today we do it > inconsistently, sometimes putting this kind of information in the > "Proposal" field or even as a comment. But if we want to easily extract a > disposition of comments report we need to be coding resolutions > consistently. > > And remember, we might not get many comments on Part 3, but we need to get > this processing working so we can handle a lot more comments for the > longer Part 1, and eventually the ISO review for all 3 parts, where we > could get hundreds of comments, were some form of automated reporting will > be necessary. > > I think C) will give us the most control. To do this we'll need 1) A > defined JIRA filter that will include all public review comments, and 2) > An XSLT transform from JIRA/RSS to a simple text output listing the issue, > submitter, submit date, resolution and URL of the full JIRA issue. > > Regards, > > -Rob > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]