RE: [office] JIRA: Request ODF 1.2 Part 3 Target

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

I've used the "ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 1" Affects Version consistently for stating
issues against the Public Review document, but those don't show up in a
filter group off the summary.  I thought they did, but I can't make it
happen.

Apparently the summary page only lists the targets for fixes.  It didn't
seem appropriate to use "ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 1" for that but I guess I should
be using it instead of the generic "ODF 1.2".  Having a generic "ODF 1.2
Part 3" for the fixed-in-version seems more apt.

I think I'll just have to make my own filter.  I was hoping there was a
consistently visible way of all of us seeing what is open, what has been
handled, etc., what is resolved but not yet applied, and so on in regard to
ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 1 and the Public Review.

 - Dennis

PS: As a reviewer of ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 1, I know if I was not on the
committee I'd want very much to be able to tell I wasn't wasting energy
working up a submission on something that was already known and I could
focus on other things and commenting on already-proposed resolutions that
mattered to me.  As a TC member I have the same concerns but I have more
resources for mitigating that concern. It still takes a fair amount of
housekeeping and researching to avoid duplication. 

-----Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200912/msg00050.html
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:00
To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [office] JIRA: Request ODF 1.2 Part 3 Target

"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 12/04/2009 
11:59:19 AM:

> 
> [office] JIRA: Request ODF 1.2 Part 3 Target
> 
> For various reasons, it is not possible to easily find issues 
> against ODF 1.2 Part 3 cd01 on the JIRA Summary page for the ODF TC.
> 
> I request that there be a new to-be-fixed-in target of "ODF 1.2 Part
> 3"  This would allow Part 3 issues to be tracked and found without 
> having them embedded in the giant pot of generic ODF 1.2 targeted 
> items (of which there appear to be 900 at the moment).
> 

Have you seen the target we have called "ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 1"?  Does that


[ ... ]