[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Revised ODF 1.2 Part 1 Public Review Ballot Motion
Michael, Technically, I think a better way to look at my motion was as one to amend your motion to change the Public Review duration from 60 days to 90 days. Since you (the mover) did not accept my amendment, I withdraw the motion to amend the Public Review duration. I think that is tidier. I appreciate that an extension of an in-progress Public Review period is permissible, and we can take that up with a new motion if and when the need arises. - Dennis PS: I think, technically, it is not possible to table a motion to amend another motion. The motion to amend must be dispensed with first. In any case, I withdraw the motion and will be more precise in the language I use in future motions on the list. -----Original Message----- From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200912/msg00063.html Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 04:25 To: OpenDocument Mailing List Subject: [office] Revised ODF 1.2 Part 1 Public Review Ballot Motion [ ... ] Dennis further made a motion to extend the public review period to 90 days. This motion has been seconded. This means that we not only have to vote regarding a CD and a public review, but also about the duration of the public review (60 or 90 days). To consider that motion on the hand, and to provide the TC with the flexibility to possibly revise the draft after 60 days review or to conduct a combined review of all three parts after 60 days on the other hand, Rob has made the following proposal: We start with a 60 day public review, but possibly vote for extending the review by 30 days towards the end of the review. He has further confirmed with the OASIS TC administration that this is possible. Essentially, this means that the requested ballot regarding extending the public review to 90 days would be deferred towards the end the public review if it is not withdrawn or replaced by other motions. If we include the option to run a ballot regarding extending the public review any time between now and the end of the public review, we actually consider both motions that have been seconded, but also Rob's proposal. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]