Re: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd (OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd.pdf) uploaded

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

Patrick,

I don't think there is anything here that the TC can approve.  It doesn't 
fit into anything in our process for any kind of deliverable.

I think the diff'ing side will need to happen using your SC34 Project 
Editor in WG6.  Of course, to the extent you find our input helpful, feel 
free to float it by the list.  But it might be better to float it directly 
on the WG6 list, and get the participation of stakeholders there.

What might work is this:

1) We agree as a TC that we want SC34 to create an amendment to ISO/IEC 
26300:2006, scoped to make that standard technically equivalent to OASIS 
ODF 1.1.  We commit to providing OASIS ODF 1.1 formally as material for 
that project, once the subdivision occurs in SC34.  Informally, of course, 
you could start on the editing work immediately, as evidently you already 
have.  But the point is we submit only documents that are OASIS final 
deliverables, like ODF 1.1.  We don't submit diff's.  But you create 
diff's from what we submit.  That'll keep the lawyers happy.

2) Before we formally contribute the ODF 1.1 text, the TC would need to 
meet the requirements of the new OASIS Liaison policy, or get a waiver. 
That gives us three months to get that part done.

3) You do your diff and amendment preparation in WG6 and take that forward 
as an FPDAM.  No further approvals needed on the OASIS.

4) The TC submits comments shortly before the FPDAM ballot ends to 
reconcile the amendment with all current approved corrigenda. 

5) The TC then takes those same comments, plus whatever other ballot 
comments we receive, and prepares Approved Errata for ODF 1.1 
corresponding to ISO/IEC 26300:2006/Amd.1

-Rob 

patrick@durusau.net wrote on 01/07/2010 04:17:46 PM:


> 
> [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd 
> (OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd.pdf) uploaded
> 
> Greetings!
> 
> The automated comparison text starting at ODF 1.1 and comparing the text 
of
> ISO 26300.
> 
> Obviously both versions could use a tweak or two but all that would be
> required in addition to these would be the amendment text. I will try to
> upload a sample for that on 8 January 2010.
> 
> Hope everyone is having a great day!
> 
> Patrick
> 
>  -- Patrick Durusau*
> 
> The document named OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd
> (OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd.pdf) has been submitted by Patrick
> Durusau* to the OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications
> (OpenDocument) TC document repository.
> 
> Document Description:
> An automated comparison starting from ODF 1.1 and then comparing the 
text
> of ISO 26300. 
> 
> View Document Details:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=35854
> 
> Download Document: 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/35854/
> OpenDocument-v1.1_compare_1.0_2ndEd.pdf
> 
> 
> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email 
application
> may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and 
paste
> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
> 
> -OASIS Open Administration