[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (OFFICE-2331) OpenFormula 3.1generally
OpenFormula 3.1 generally ------------------------- Key: OFFICE-2331 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2331 Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC Issue Type: Bug Components: OpenFormula Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 1 Reporter: Patrick Durusau The paragraphs of 3.1 are problematic in general. Rather that issue a flock of JIRA issues, here is how I propose to dispose of these paragraphs: 1) First paragraph. Delete entirely. That formulas/expressions always return values may need to be said but it doesn't fit under a discussion of types. That tables cells may or may not have values and that those values may be "constant" or the result of applying a formula, doesn't belong here, either. We agreed on the conference call earlier today to remove the last two sentences. 2) Second paragraph. Delete entirely. In part because of: "many functions," "some types," "different ways," etc. All of this is important but should be stated as either definitions or requirements under the functions in question. 3) Third paragraph: If we keep the type v. pseudotype distinction, the statement would be: In OpenFormula a value is of one of the following types: (list types). And move it to the first paragraph. The rest of that paragraph should be moved to appropriate locations and converted to evaluator language. 4) Forth paragraph: I await resolution of the portable document issue on this one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]