[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Two JIRA Issues for discussion
On 19 February 2010 19:26, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote on 02/19/2010 01:04:13 PM: > >> >> > I'm reading Murta-san's request as asking that we use a RNG schema for > W3C >> > digital signatures if one is available. >> >> > My guess is that Murata-san and others would prefer that we used NVDL. >> >> >> Why not ask him instead of guessing Rob? >> >> > > We solicit public feedback via issuing public review drafts. If TC > members have a view on this issue they can weigh in on this list. If > Murata-san wishes to express his views more directly, he is welcome to > join the TC. If you wish that his views be expressed directly in the TC, > unfiltered through my guessing, then you are also welcome to suggest that > he join. Well stop guessing then. > >> >> > What might be interesting is whether we could get the ODF validators > -- >> > the ODF Tool Kit union, the Office-o-tron and the OfficeShots one, to >> > start validating all of their documents twice -- once with the > existing >> > schema and once with the re-factored schema. They can then highlight >> > whenever these two schemas differed in their results. I think that > would >> > give us high confidence if they gave identical results over several >> > months. >> >> >> And how would you place 'blame' on any difference? >> Schema capability? >> Schema definition? >> Instance content/markup? >> > > I don't think you can determine that a priori. Nor (readily) at the time. Not a good idea IMHO regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]