[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-1793) NEEDS-DISCUSSION:ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-1
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dennis Hamilton updated OFFICE-1793:
------------------------------------
Summary: NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-1 (was: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-1)
Affects Version/s: ODF 1.0 Errata 02
With respect to the Defect Report against ODF 1.0 and IS 26300:2006, I believe the correct response is to make the following Errata statements:
"""
Replace the second paragraph of 3.1.15 with the single sentence "The language is represented using a language tag in accordance with [RFC3066]."
"""
This is a factually true statement and it removes any question concerning "similar to." The schema definition, with the definition of the custom "language" datatype is completely consistent with the simpler, sharper statement.
> NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-1
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1793
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1793
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.0 Errata 02
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Patrick Durusau
> Fix For: ODF 1.2, ODF 1.0 Errata 02
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-1
> QUALIFIER clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT Clause 3.1.15
> NATURE OF DEFECT The second sentence in the second paragraph in this clause does not allow optional subtags, while such subtags are allowed in the referenced document, namely RFC 3066. Does ODF intentionally disallow subtags?
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER Just reference to RFC 3066 and stop there. Do not say anything about what is normatively specified in RFC 3066.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]