OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-1823) NEEDS-DISCUSSION:ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-32

     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Hamilton updated OFFICE-1823:

              Summary: NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-32  (was: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER 	JP2-32)
        Fix Version/s: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
                           (was: ODF 1.0 Errata 02)
                           (was: ODF 1.2)
    Affects Version/s: ODF 1.0
                       ODF 1.0 Errata 02


In the correction to 9.4.5 Extrude, the mentions of <dr3d:depth>, <dr3d:close-front>, <dr3d:close-back>, and <dr3d:back-scale> should be for attributes (e.g., dr3d:depth), not elements.  The reference to dr3d:close-back should be to (15.22.10), not (15.22.9).  A reference for dr3d:back-scale is (15.22.5).

In the correction to 9.4.6 Rotate, the mentions of <dr3d:horizontal-segments>, <dr3d:end-angle>, <dr3d:close-front>, <dr3d:close-back>, and <dr3d:back-scale> should be for attributes, not elements.  The phrase "around it's Y-Axis" should be "around its Y-Axis" (no apostrophe in "its").  The reference to dr3d:close-back should be to (15.22.10), not 15.22.9.  A reference for dr3d:back-scale is (15.22.5).

*** ISSUE *** In the 9.4.5 and 9.4.6 descriptions, speaking of the front and back planes as existing or not is peculiar.  The plane is always there.  I think the question is whether or not the polygon on the front or back plane is considered to have an opaque interior surface or not.  It would appear that there is no control over the opacity of the side planes.  Or is the open-/closed-distinction something else entirely?

*** ISSUE ***
Nowhere is it described what the direction of rotation is with respect to the assumed position of a viewer in the coordinate system of the rotated object.  It is clear that rotation is in only one direction (the angles must be non-negative numbers).   It is not stated in 9.4.6 how the Y-Axis that the object is rotated about is determined.  (In searching for where rotation might be defined further, I note that the interaction of rotation with extrusion and other impact of section 9.5 is not accounted for either.)
*** iSSUE ***

*** ISSUE *** 
The description of dr3d:back-scale does not specify that it is applicable to <dr3d:rotate>.  If it *is* applicable, how is the change from front scale to back scale adapted to in any intermediate steps of the polygon rotation?  There is still a mention of lathe objects in 15.22.5.

In the correction to 15.22.8 End Angle, the replacement leaves the final (Example) paragraph, with its mention of a lathe object, unchanged.

*** ISSUE ***
In 15.22.9, with or without this change, the wording suggest that the dr3d:close-front="true" causes the front to be open, and any other case, including absence of the attribute, causes the front to be closed.  This seems very contradictory and not helpful in undrstanding the mentions of this attribute in the replacements for 9.4.5 and 9.4.6.  This should be corrected to state what the true and false cases are and which is the default when the attribute is absent.

*** ISSUE *** In 15.22.10 there is the same problem concerning the settings and defaults as for 15.22.9.  Also, an ellipse is not a great example.  The question is, what is the difference between what is visible through the front and/or back when it is open versus when it is closed?

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OFFICE-1823
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1823
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>             Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> QUALIFIER 	clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT 	Clause 15.22.8 thru 15.22.10
> NATURE OF DEFECT 	These subclauses are incomprehensible.
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER 	Add diagrams and introduce more explanatory text.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]