[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 03/30/2010 06:52:29 PM: > > Good, I forgot about the reconciliation approach from the older discussions. > > Is it good enough for the FPDAM to be prepared against IS 26300:2006 as it > is now, before the DCORi are finalized, and sync it all in the > reconciliation? > I think we have a choice of 3 initial texts we could do the initial diff from: A) ISO/IEC 26300 B) ISO/IEC 26300 + COR 1 C) ISO/IEC 26300 + COR 2 I don't think we want to wait for C to happen, since the DCOR ballot has not yet started, and we still need to make some more changes on the OASIS side and have another 15 day review. So COR 2 is at least 4 months away. We could wait for COR 1 and option B) if we wanted, since the ballot for that has ended and we know what those corrections are. Or we could do option A. I think that is what Patrick's initial diff was. I don't have a strong opinion on A versus B. -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]