[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-1798) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-6
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19269#action_19269 ]
Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-1798:
-----------------------------------------
Svante, it is possible to say where "(see below)" is intended (there is a link in the "below" in ODF 1.0).
If it was important enough to say it (I don't know that), then there is a way to say it correctly.
I have no objection to omission of "(see below)."
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-6
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1798
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1798
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Svante Schubert
> Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-6
> QUALIFIER clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT Clause 7.3.2
> NATURE OF DEFECT The phrase "see below" does not make sense, since the schema frament below this paragraph does not say anything about "there must not be more than one element for any outline level".
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]