[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on DocumentPackaging"
Hi Rob, you wrote: > I'm not saying that there are not interesting things that could be > standardized here. For example, it might be nice to have a standard URL > protocol for ZIP, or standard fragment schema for URL addressing of ZIP > items, etc. Or any other conventions that are effectively a layer between > core ZIP's compression/packaging specification and what ODF/OOXML/EPUB > use. But including the core ZIP packaging/compression in the same > standard is a real bad idea, IMHO. As I said before, it is like > specifying Unicode and XML in the same standard. Or XML and ODF in the > same standard. > Surely the work item proposal asks for an _independent_ standard? Or am I getting you wrong here? I otherwise tend to agree with Dennis, there's merit to have properly standardized what we're referencing, instead of reliance on single-vendor goodwill ... Cheers, -- Thorsten
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]