OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [office] Motion for approving ODF 1.2 as Committee Draft andsubmitting it for pubic review.

On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 14:31 -0600, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Moreover, doesn't the language:
> > ODF v1.2 consists of the following files and schemas:
> >    
> answer the question?
> the "ODF v1.2" in question is the one specified by the files and schemas.
> What seems unclear about that?

Similarly on Fri, 2010-06-11 at 14:26 -0600, robert_weir@us.ibm.com
> We're only required to 
> identify which version of the specification, of the ones uploaded,
> will 
> comprise the authoritative version.  We could have just as well
> identified 
> them by name, e.g., *.odt.  But as stated in the ballot, it is
> unambiguous 
> which files are the ODF ones.  We agree that they are the ones with
> the 
> odt file extension, right?

Not to be nitpicky, but the motion reads:
> Shall further from the three versions of the specification documents
> (ODF, PDF and HTML) that will be produced after approval as committee
> draft the ODF versions be the authoritative ones?

so this refers to versions of the specification that _will_ be produced
after approval. So it does not refer to the files that are already

> Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend!

Thank you! I do. I hope you do too!


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]