OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-1812) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-21



    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19661#action_19661 ] 

Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-1812:
-----------------------------------------

I agree that use of a namespace prefix that is not otherwise defined is certainly implementation-dependent - we say that the namespace binding determines the syntax and semantics, however that is known..  However, we have not felt the need to say so elsewhere where we state the same provision.  

However, since we say that there *should* be a prefix, but one is not required, it seems fair to make explicit that the interpretation in the absence of a namespace is definitely implementation-dependent.   

I don't mind that we make more than that implementation-dependent, but it has not been the practice when a namespace prefix is supplied.

> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-21
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-1812
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1812
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Svante Schubert 
>             Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER 	JP2-21
> QUALIFIER 	clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT 	"Condition" in Clause 8.5.3 (original text incorrectly said '8.5.2'
> NATURE OF DEFECT 	The BNF in this subclause is very unclear. Where is whitespace allowed? Which symbol is a non-terminal symbol and which is a terminal symbol?
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER 	Use ISO 14977.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]