OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-2608) ODF 1.0 Errata CD04Defects



     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Hamilton updated OFFICE-2608:
------------------------------------

             Proposal: 
Consider redeveloping all of Errata 01 CD04 as an Errata for ODF 1.1 that can become a Draft Corrigendum to the 1.1-aligned IS 26300.  This would allow collaboration on understandability and satisfaction of resolution with WG6 without rushing resolution against 1.0 and IS 26300:2006 unamended.

Although these are related to Defect Reports for ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 ed.2, and IS 26300:2006, they need to be rolled up to ODF 1.1 Errata and also be harmonized appropriately with ODF 1.2.  In particular, the identification of implementation-dependency in some of these needs to be eliminated or refined in ODF 1.2 if practicable.

  was:Consider redeveloping all of Errata 01 CD04 as an Errata for ODF 1.1 that can become a Draft Corrigendum to the 1.1-aligned IS 26300.  This would allow collaboration on understandability and satisfaction of resolution with WG6 without rushing resolution against 1.0 and IS 26300:2006 unamended.

          Environment: Although these are related to Defect Reports for ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 ed.2, and IS 26300:2006, they need to be rolled up to ODF 1.1 Errata and also be harmonized appropriately with ODF 1.2.  In particular, the identification of implementation-dependency in some of these needs to be eliminated or refined in ODF 1.2 if practicable.
        Fix Version/s: ODF 1.2 CD 06
                       ODF 1.1 Errata 01
    Affects Version/s: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5
                       ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 2
                       ODF 1.1
           Resolution: 
This collection of issues have been addressed in the issues it is referencing.
The resolution of each issue has been written into the referenced issues.

[The roll-up into Errata for ODF 1.1 and assurance that the defect does not remain in ODF 1.2 is still to be done.]

  was:
This collection of issues have been addressed in the issues it is referencing.
The resolution of each issue has been written into the referenced issues.


> ODF 1.0 Errata CD04 Defects
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2608
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2608
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.1, ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 2, ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5
>         Environment: Although these are related to Defect Reports for ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 ed.2, and IS 26300:2006, they need to be rolled up to ODF 1.1 Errata and also be harmonized appropriately with ODF 1.2.  In particular, the identification of implementation-dependency in some of these needs to be eliminated or refined in ODF 1.2 if practicable.
>            Reporter: Dennis Hamilton
>            Assignee: Svante Schubert 
>             Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5, ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5, ODF 1.2 CD 06, ODF 1.1 Errata 01, Task
>
>
> This is an appraisal of ODF 1.0 Errata CD04 based on review of the document.  To assist in that review, a changed-tracked ODF 1.0 specification was prepared.  It is uploaded at 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=37110>.
> The change-tracked document reflects all changes specified in Approved ODF 1.0 Errata 01 (Part 1 of CD04) and the proposed Part 2 in Errata CD04.
> 1. GENERAL REMARKS ON ERRATA CD04
> ODF 1.0 Errata CD04 is found at 
> <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.0/errata/cd04/>
> 1.1 ODF 1.1 Errata CD04 is found at 
> <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.0/errata/>.
>   This is surely a mistake.  Should not OASIS ODF 1.0 Approved Errata 01 remain in this location until superseded?
> 1.2 Errata CD04, p.5, start of Approved Errata Part 01:
>   In the last line of the first paragraph, "N0492" should be "N0942".
> 1.3 All Part 1 and Part 2 items.  
>   In general, the honoring of typographic style (include use of italic text and monospace fonts) in quoted passages and their replacements is absent.  Appearance of monospace font styles in Part 2 is inconsistent.
>   (In the change-tracked document, use of italic and monospace styles is maintained consistently with the styles in the OASIS ODF 1.0 Standard.)
> 1.4 Part 1 Defect Items Not Resolved by Changes
>   The use of the term "Rejected" is perhaps too abrupt in contrast with "No action" or something culturally softer in an international context.  
>   For N0942:30, it would be more helpful to explain why the defect was not applicable (i.e., that 15.4.1 does not mention 8.8.4 and a mention in a different section has been repaired).
>   When ODF 1.0 Errata are transposed to ODF 1.1 and its IS 26300 alignment, I think we should look at gentler rewordings.  It may also be useful to revisit N0942:89 on that occasion.
> 1.5 Part 2 Defect Items Not Resolved by Changes
>   There is a peculiar statement: "The behavior in question is implementation dependent for purposes of ISO 26300."  It is not clear why the situation is any different for the purposes of ODF 1.0 (and why the statement is being made in a document that is specific to ODF 1.0).  In any case, we are requested by SC34 WG6 to revisit these statements and provide explicit assertions in the specification when the provision in question implementation-dependent.  These items are reflected in the detailed list, below.
> 2. RESOLUTIONS FOR SPECIFIC DEFECT ITEMS (in section sequence)
> 2.1.2, sub-heading Version
> N1309:6 OFFICE-2203 Resolution Seems Incomplete
> 3.1.15 Language
> N1078:1 OFFICE-1793 Sharper resolution available
> 4.4.1, sub-heading Protected Sections
> N1078:18 OFFICE-1810 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 6.7.2 Fixed
> N1078:2 OFFICE-1794 Seems non-responsive or incomplete
> 7.3.1 sub-headings Use Outline and Use Index Marks
> N1078:3 OFFICE-1795 **** CORECTION MADE IN WRONG PLACE ****
> 7.3.1 sub-heading Use Index Source Styles
> N1078:4 OFFICE-1796 Explanation for no-change could be cleaner
> 7.3.1 sub-heading Index Scope
> N1078:5 OFFICE-1797 **** Change is not responsive ****
> 7.3.2 Table of Content Entry Template
> N1078:6 OFFICE-1798 There is a better correction
> 7.7.1 sub-heading Use Copy Outline Levels
> N1078:8 OFFICE-1800 Seems non-responsive or incomplete
> 8.8.1 sub-heading Protected
> N1078:11 OFFICE-1803 is default for style:cell-protect a factor?
> N1078:18 OFFICE-1810 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 8.1.2 sub-heading Visibility
> N1078:13 OFFICE-1805 Confusion about invisibility for collapsed rows
> 8.1.3 sub-heading Value Type
> N1078:14 OFFICE-1806 **** MISSED ERROR IN NAME OF ATTRIBUTE ****
> 8.1.3 sub-heading Cell Current Numeric Value
> N1078:14 OFFICE-1806 **** MISSED OCCURRENCE OF THE DEFECT ****
> 8.1.3 sub-headings Cell Current Currency, Cell Current Date Value, Cell Current Time Value, Cell Current Boolean Value, and cell Current String Value
> N1078:14 OFFICE-1806 **** "value type" insufficient and remarks about "only evaluated" misleading about when allowed ****
> 8.1.3 sub-heading Table Cell Protection
> N1078:15 OFFICE-1807 **** TWO PROBLEMS MISSED ****
> 8.3.4 Shapes
> N1078:16 OFFICE-1808 **** Restatement does not appear to improve.  Does not resolve the original issue ****
> 8.4.3 Detective, 8.4.4 Detective Operation, 8.4.5 Highlighted Range
> N1078:17 OFFICE-1809 Appears Insufficient
> 8.5.1 Document Protection
> N1078:18 OFFICE-1810 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 8.5.2 sub-heading Search Criteria Must Apply to Whole cell
> N1078:20 OFFICE-1811 Not section 8.5, not sure false case is accurate and what interaction with regular expression is -- MAY BE TOO SUBSTANTIVE ****
> 8.5.2 sub-heading Use Regular Expressions
> N1309:4 OFFICE-2201 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 8.5.3 sub-heading Condition
> N1078:21 OFFICE-1812 **** INCOMPLETE CORRECTION.  USE OF IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT OFF THE MARK ****
> 8.6.10 sub-heading Function
> N1078:23 OFFICE-1814 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 8.8 Data Pilot Tables
> N1078:22 OFFICE-1813 Insufficient explanation.  Maybe needs further consideration?
> 8.8.4 sub-heading Function
> N1078:23 OFFICE-1814 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 8.8.4 sub-heading Used Hierarchy
> N1078:26 OFFICE-1817 May be another place for implementation dependency also, though implicit
> 8.8.7 sub-heading Function
> N1078:23 OFFICE-1814 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 8.9 sub-heading Function
> N1078:23 OFFICE-1814 **** NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENT ****
> 9.2.5 sub-heading Sharpness
> N0942:66 (already-approved): Definite articles, "the", beter than "an" here.
> 9.2.9 Connector
> N1078:25 OFFICE-1816 May need "further consideration required" (implementation dependent would be a massive problem)
> 9.2.11 Measure
> N1078:27 OFFICE-1818 May need "further consideration required" and/or characteristics of the measure shape are implementation dependent (a forward reference to the appropriate styles section would have helped some).
> 9.3 sub-heading Relative Sizes
> N0942:52 (already approved).  The changed font style of "scale" is not explicit.  *** NEEDS NEW ERRATA ITEM ***
> 9.3.3 sub-heading Object Data
> N0942:60 might merit some additional thought 
> 9.3.11 sub-heading Common Image Map Attributes and Elements
> N0942:04 DIFFERENT FOR 1.0 AND 26300.  Watch out for 1.1 ALIGNMENT.
> 9.4.5 Extrude.
> N1078:32 OFFICE-1823 **** REVISION USES ELEMENT NAMES INSTEAD OF CORRECT ATTRIBUTE NAMES **** More considerations in OFFICE-1823
> 9.4.6 Rotate.
> N078:32 OFFICE-1823 **** REVISION USES ELEMENT NAMES INSTEAD OF CORRECT ATTRIBUTE NAMES **** More considerations in OFFICE-1823
> 9.5.2 sub-headings Extrusion First Light Harsh and Extrusion Second Light Harsh
> N1309:3 OFFICE-2200 harsh is not used this way to specify harsh lighting, it is a common default.  "false" case is not defined at all.  See OFFICE-2200.  **** MAY NEED DEFINITION AND IMPLEMENTATION-DEPENDENT STATEMENTS ****
> 9.7.2 sub-heading Effect
> N0942:24 (already approved).  SAME DEFECT IN 2 PLACES, ONLY CAUGHT IN ONE
> 15.3.4 Border Line Width
> N0942:89 already approved. Something is missing in the relationship between the border lines proximate to headers and footers and border lines elsewhere, and their being the same.
> 15.4.38 Text Combine
> N1309:7 OFFICE-2204 "WITHIN TWO LINES" STILL UNCLEAR - See OFFICE_2204
> 15.5.38 Snap to Layout Grid
> N0942:67 (already-approved) typo in attribute name in first line
> 15.19 Connector Properties (entire section)
> N1078:25 OFFICE-1816 *** NEEDS FURTHER CONSIDERATION AND DEFERRED RESOLUTION ***
> 15.20 Measure Properties (entire section)
> N1078:29 OFFICE-1820 *** NEEDS FURTHER CONSIDERATION AND DEFERRED RESOLUTION ***
> 15.22.8 End Angle
> N1078:32 OFFICE-1823 INCOMPLETE
> 15.22.9 Close Front
> N1078:32 OFFICE-1823 INCOMPLETE
> 15.22.10 Close Back
> N1078:32 OFFICE-1823 INCOMPLETE
> 15.24.4 Mode
> N1078:31 OFFICE-1822 NOT RESPONSIVE?
> 15.27.21 Wrapping
> N0942:92 (already approved).  CORRECTION DUPLICATES A WORD
> 15.27.31 Wrap Influence on Position
> N0942:95 (already approved).  GRAMMAR ERROR IN CORRECTION
> 15.31.4 Tickmarks
> N0942:79 (already approved).  Minor wording defect
> 17.5 Usage of URIs Within Packages
> N1078:34 OFFICE-1825
> N1078:35 OFFICE-1826
> **** CHANGES CANNOT BE APPLIED TO ODF 1.0.  These are about IS 26300 and perhaps ODF 1.1 provisions. ****
> Appendix B. References, [Zip] entry
> N1309:8 OFFICE-2205
> **** CHANGE CANNOT BE APPLIED TO ODF 1.0.  A different reference is used than the one in IS 26300 (and presumably ODF 1.1).  The one in ODF 1.0 is also referenced in ODF 1.2. ****
>   *** END ***
>   
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]