[OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-2638) 19.511style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann updated OFFICE-2638:
-------------------------------------------

      Proposal: 
ad 19.511 style:rel-height:
Replace
"scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."
by
"scale-min: the height should be calculated as for value scale, but the calculated height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."

ad 19.512.2 <draw:frame>:
Replace
"scale: the height should be calculated depending on the width, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved."
by
"scale: the width should be calculated depending on the height, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved."
and replace
"scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."
by
"scale-min: the width should be calculated as for value scale, but the calculated width is a minimum width rather than an absolute one."

ad 20.239 and 20.330.1
Replacements according to the above ones.

    Resolution: Please resolve as proposed - please adjust wording, if needed.

> 19.511 style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2638
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Text
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05
>            Reporter: Patrick Durusau
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06
>
>
> The value scale-min now reads:
> "scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."
> The value scale reads:
> "scale: the height should be calculated depending on the width, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved."
> I was replacing the "equals" in scale-min when I noticed that "...is a minimum height rather than an absolute one." isn't meaningful.
> Nor does it make much sense to say that "...the calculated width or height is a minimum height.." Both width and height are a minimum height? 
> Is the purpose to say that the original ratio of the original object size is not preserved? (implementation dependent?)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira