[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] IRI vs URI Discussion Today (2010-09-13)
It seems I lied about the %62 business. It can be restored to "b" as part of URI normalization and [RFC3986] says un-%-encoding of codes corresponding to unreserved US-ASCII characters can be done any time. But anything that would become a reserved character (or an unrecognized character) in the US-ASCII set in a URI should not be touched (and IRI encoding mapping and inverting shouldn't touch it). -----Original Message----- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 18:03 To: 'Andreas J. Guelzow' Cc: 'ODF TC List' Subject: RE: [office] IRI vs URI Discussion Today (2010-09-13) [ ... ] PS: using %62 instead of the letter "b" is definitely not recommended. It should certainly not be done by software. But if it is in an IRI that comes into our possession, it is wise not to change it. The security issues that go with this sort of thing (as a way of obscuring something about a web site or resource) might be handled by how it is presented, but not by automatically adjusting it. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]