OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-2603) Add (non-normative ?)reference to IEEE 754 and 854



     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Weir  updated OFFICE-2603:
---------------------------------

     Summary: Add (non-normative ?) reference to IEEE 754 and 854  (was: NEEDS-DISCUSSION Add (non-normative ?) reference to IEEE 754 and 854)
    Proposal: 
In section 3.6, remove the second paragraph, "In practice, applications tend....results for a large number of places."

In section 4.3.1, remove the first note, "Note: Many evaluators...more than 64 bits)."

  was:
Add the following two informative references:

[IEEE 754] 754-1985 IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE (1985)
[IEEE 854] 854-1987 Standard for Radix-Independent Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE (1987)

[Rob's note:  these standards are better known by their numbers rather than their titles, so that is why I'm suggesting the short names as above]

In section 3.6, change:

"In practice, applications tend to use at least one IEEE 754-1985 binary floating-point"

to

"In practice, applications tend to use at least one [IEEE 754] binary floating-point"

and change:

"When IEEE 754 representations are used"

to

"When [IEEE 754] representations are used"

and change:

"Applications may use IEEE 854-1987"

to

"Applications may use [IEEE 854]"

Finally, in section 4.3.1, change:

"Many evaluators implement numbers as 64-bit IEEE floating point values"

to

"Many evaluators implement numbers as 64-bit [IEEE 754] floating point values"



For reference, this was the old proposal:

------------------------------------
Add the following two informative references:

[IEEE 754] 754-1985 IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE (1985)
[IEEE 854] 854-1987 Standard for Radix-Independent Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE (1987)

[Rob's note:  these standards are better known by their numbers rather than their titles, so that is why I'm suggesting the short names as above]

In section 3.6, change:

"In practice, applications tend to use at least one IEEE 754-1985 binary floating-point"

to

"In practice, applications tend to use at least one [IEEE 754] binary floating-point"

and change:

"When IEEE 754 representations are used"

to

"When [IEEE 754] representations are used"

and change:

"Applications may use IEEE 854-1987"

to

"Applications may use [IEEE 854]"

Finally, in section 4.3.1, change:

"Many evaluators implement numbers as 64-bit IEEE floating point values"

to

"Many evaluators implement numbers as 64-bit [IEEE 754] floating point values"


> Add (non-normative ?) reference to IEEE 754 and 854
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2603
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2603
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OpenFormula
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 1
>            Reporter: Bart Hanssens
>            Assignee: Robert Weir 
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06
>
>
> 2.6 Numerical methods mentions IEEE 754-1985 and IEEE 854-1987.
> Perhaps they should be added as (non normative ?) references in 1.5

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]