[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-3417) Public Comment:Comment on ODF v1.2 CD 05 - Document Signatures

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=21545#action_21545 ] 

Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-3417:
-----------------------------------------

More from David LeBlanc [presumed by me to be about the notion of supporting both names] <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201009/msg00617.html>:

It may be possible to do it this way, but I don't think its desirable. It opens up the possibility that one signature is valid and the other is not. Or a legacy app might have updated the signature in some way (e.g., add a timestamp), so that one evaluates differently than the other. Trying to communicate that sort of state to the user poses serious difficulties.


> Public Comment: Comment on ODF v1.2 CD 05 - Document Signatures
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-3417
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3417
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Needs Discussion, Public Review
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06
>
>
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: "Pope, Nick" <Nick.Pope@thales-esecurity.com> 
> Original date: 6 Sep 2010 19:48:26 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/201009/msg00001.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira