[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-3385) ODF 1.2-1 5.4.1<text:section> Fails to deal with modified/unmodified limitations
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=21950#action_21950 ] Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-3385: ----------------------------------------- I can't find the sentence that is supposed to be replaced. Is this CD05 or a CD05-rev that is being spoken of? I also don't think that the change resolves this issue. What I understand from earlier comments from Michael is this: 1. When a <text:section> element hans an an initial <text:section-source> or <office:dde-source> element, the following markup in the <text:section> element is derived by access to a separate source and that source may be external to the XML document containing the <text:section> element. 2. The nature of separate sources and the production of <text:section> markup from such sources are implementation-dependent. Is that the bottom line? If so, why isn't that said? > ODF 1.2-1 5.4.1 <text:section> Fails to deal with modified/unmodified limitations > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-3385 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3385 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Public Review > Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05 > Reporter: Dennis Hamilton > Assignee: Patrick Durusau > Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06 > > > The <text:section> is allowed to contain any sequence of element-content instances. The text suggests that this sequence of child elements is obtained from some source. The presence of the text permits a consumer to interpret the document without re-accessing the source (or even when the source is not accessible). > There is also the prospect, not described in ODF 1.2, but explicitly accounted for in ODF 1.1 (and by the presence of optional protection attributes on the <text:section> element) that the content obtained from the source has been modifed by the producer. > What is not clear here or in ODF 1.1 is whether certain element content is acceptable from a source or must always be a result of modification of the sourced markup. For example, what does it mean for change-marks to be obtained in the markup from a source? a <text:section> element? Any <text:*-ref> elements? Any bookmarks and index marks of various kinds? Any already-used xml:id, etc.? > There seems to need to be considerable qualification involved in what is obtained from a source and what may have resulted from modification of source-obtained markup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]